Minutes

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
September 10, 2007


The Town Council met in regular session on Monday, September 10, 2007, in the Council Room of the Town Hall, 127 Center Street, South. Mayor M. Jane Seeman, called the meeting to order with the following members of Council present: Laurie G. Cole, Daniel M. Dellinger, Edythe F. Kelleher, George E. Lovelace, Michael J. Polychrones, and Maud F. Robinson. Also present were John H. Schoeberlein, Town Manager; Steven D. Briglia, Town Attorney; and Carol A. Orndorff, Town Clerk.

The invocation was offered by a member of the Local Spiritual Assembly of the Baha’i of the Town of Vienna; followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.



APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 20, 2007 AND TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS OF AUGUST 20, 2007.

It was moved for the approval of the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of August 20, 2007 and Two Public Hearings of August 20, 2007, as submitted subject to the typographical changes presented by the Town Clerk this date.

Motion: Cole
Second: Dellinger
Motion carried unanimously




RECEIPT OF PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC

Mrs. Lynn Sanderson, 304 George Street, S.W., addressed Council and apologized for not having attended the last several meetings however, she would make an effort to be present in the future. She stated she had several suggestions to present to the Town Council. First, the leaf pickup should begin two weeks later than usual, due to the fact the leaves have not begun to fall from the trees. Second, she would ask that Chief Carlisle contact her as she would like to discuss reciprocity between the Town of Vienna and Fairfax County. Third, she would ask if the Town planned to purchase a new trash truck, and if so, she would suggest that the vehicle be one with the recycling bins on the side. Fourth, she would question when the Town Council will be considering the purchase of water from Falls Church; she would like a Town Hall meeting to discuss the facts relative to what is being paid to Falls Church and the County of Fairfax for the sewage; and what it would cost to switch everything over to Fairfax County. These facts should be published in the Town Newsletter and let the residents of the Town of Vienna decide as to what is the most cost effective.

The Town Manager indicated the Town Council and staff are currently working on the issue at the present time; that probably within the next few months the Town Council would be conducting a meeting on the water and sewer issues.




REPORT AND INQUIRIES OF COUNCIL MEMBERS


Councilman Dellinger invited all present to the 911 Ceremony at the Freeman House, which is sponsored by the Town and the American Legion Post #180. He stated the Ceremony would begin at 10:00 A.M., with Mayor Seeman indicating that the Church bells would begin ringing at 9:45 A.M.

Councilman Polychrones stated he would not be present at the Council Work Session on September 17, 2007 as he would be out of Town at the ABA Conference.

Councilman Lovelace discussed with the Town Manager the procedure for obtaining permission to conduct block parties, with Mr. Schoeberlein indicating the procedure was similar to that established for banner display. Council Lovelace suggested the procedure should be published in the Town Newsletter for information of the residents.

Councilman Lovelace spoke of his inspection, along with the Director of Planning & Zoning and members of staff, of a new home being constructed, the purpose of which was the determination of structure height, and the calculations utilized. He indicated that his report on this aspect would be forthcoming to Members of Council; and thereafter, expressed his appreciation to Mr. Hembree and staff for their time and assistance.



REPORT OF THE TOWN MANAGER

None



REPORT OF THE MAYOR

Mayor Seeman announced that on Tuesday evening, September 11, 2007, at 8:00 P.M. a new program called “Vienna At Your Service” will be held. The program will feature the Department of Planning & Zoning, with Mr. Hembree providing an overview of the various zoning regulations. Mr. Hembree will be happy to answer all questions relative to the various aspects of the zoning portion of the Town Code, along with all planning and zoning issues. The Mayor invited all present to attend this new feature program.

Mayor Seeman spoke of the News Release by the Police Department regarding their participation in the “Cell Phone for Soldiers” program. She stated that if anyone had an old out of date cell phone they could donate it to the Police Department, who in turn will send them to a company in Missouri for recycling and issuance to our soldiers for their use.

Mayor Seeman indicated that she had spotted two “white goods” sitting on Locust Street, S.E., in the first block off of Park Street. She stated the Town of course, does not pick up white goods any longer and felt these items should be checked-on and removed if necessary.

The Mayor stated that on Sunday morning at approximately 9:45 A.M., she noticed the Police had to stop earth moving activity on Branch Road being done by the project sub-contractor. She was made aware of this activity by citizen complaints, and was happy to see the Police Department had responded and the work suspended as it is not allowed on Sunday, by Town Ordinance.

Mayor Seeman stated she had received positive feedback from many citizens relative to the Solar Speed Signs, and indicated that she will be requesting additional solar signs in the next Budget.

Mayor Seeman recognized two Boy Scouts who were present in the audience, and invited them to come forward and introduce themselves. One indicated he was from Troop #872 and was presently working on his Communication Merit Badge; and the other was from Troop #152, who was presently working on his Citizenship-in-the-Community Merit Badge.

Mayor Seeman at this time reported on the Closed Session convened this date at 7:15 P.M. She stated the Closed Session was called for the specific purpose of discussing various Board and Commission vacancies and potential appointments to fill those vacancies; that no other business had been conducted.

It was moved that the Members of the Vienna Town Council be polled to affirm that during the Closed Session convened this date, September 10, 2007, the Town Council discussed matters of personnel relative to appointments to fill Board and Commission vacancies. It was further moved that the Certification Resolution be adopted in accordance with State Statutes and the Town Clerk is authorized to execute the Certification Resolution. It was further moved that the Closed Session be continued to September 17, 2007 at 7:15 P.M. in accordance with Virginia Code Section 2.2-3711.A(1) for the purpose of discussing matters of personnel, specifically the conducting of interviews with individuals interested in appointment and/or reappointment to Town Boards and Commissions.

Motion: Kelleher
Second: Robinson
Carried unanimously – Poll vote

Voting Aye: Cole, Dellinger, Kelleher, Lovelace, Polychrones,
Robinson, Mayor Seeman

As noted above the Town Clerk conducted a Poll vote of the Members of Council, recorded same and thereafter, executed the Certification Resolution. (Original attached to Official Minutes.)

It was moved that Charles Anderson be appointed to the Planning Commission for a two year term of office, effective September 11, 2007 and to expire September 11, 2009.

Motion: Kelleher
Second: Robinson
Carried unanimously – Poll vote

Voting Aye: Cole, Dellinger, Kelleher, Lovelace, Polychrones,
Robinson, Mayor Seeman



PROPOSALS FOR ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO THE AGENDA

None



PUBLIC HEARING ON A ZONING CHANGE AT 117 EAST STREET, S.E. AND 116 BERRY STREET, S.E., SEEKING APPROVAL TO BUILD TWO (2) THREE-STORY, ELEVEN UNIT CONDOMINIUM BUILDINGS WITH BASEMENT-LEVEL PARKING ON A 1.01 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND, FILED BY AGENT OF AYRHILL HOMES, LLC., OWNER.

See Official Minutes attached.



PUBLIC HEARING ON A ZONING CHANGE AT 223 TAPAWINGO ROAD, S.E., SEEKING APPROVAL TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON A 14,575 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL OF LAND WHICH HAS BEEN ZONED COMMERCIALLY SINCE 1958, FILED BY AGEND OF WEDDERBURN HOMES, LC, OWNER.

Mayor Seeman announced that a letter had been received from Ms. Lynne Strobel, Attorney and agent for the applicant, which requests that the rezoning application be withdrawn. (Letter of withdrawal dated September 7, 2007, attached to Official Minutes.)



REQUEST AUTHORIZATION RIDE THE CITY OF HARRISONBURG, PENNSYLVANIA CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF ONE BELT DRIVEN VACUUM LEAF LOADER, MODEL LCT650, JOHN DEERE 4045T, 84 HORSEPOWER TURBO DIESEL ENGINE, TANDEM AXEL, TRAILER MOUNTED, WITH A HYDRAULIC OPERATED HOSE BOOM, IN AN ESTIMATED COST OF $17,298.00.

It was moved for approval to ride the City of Harrisburg, PA, Capital City Contract in order to purchase One (11) Belt-Driven Vacuum Leaf Loader, Model LTC650, John Deere 4045T,84 Horsepower Turbo Diesel Engine from Old Dominion Brush Company, Inc., with a bid price of $17,298.00 under the Town of Vienna Vehicle Replacement Program for vehicle number #200.

Motion: Cole
Second: Dellinger
Carried unanimously – Poll vote

Voting Aye: Cole, Dellinger, Kelleher, Lovelace, Polychrones,
Robinson, Mayor Seeman




REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A BLANKET PURCHASE ORDER WITH VENDOR AAC IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,812.00 TO COVER TWO PLANNED PROJECTS PLUS ANY EMERGENCY TYPE NETWORK EXPENSES IN FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008 FOR PHONE SUPPORT, ONLINE SUPPORT AND ONSITE SUPPORT FOR THE TOWN’S WIDE AREA NETWORK.

It was moved for approval to issue a blanket purchase order in the amount of $14,812.00 with AAC of Tysons Corner, Virginia, for telephone support, online support and onsite support of the Town’s wide area network in Fiscal Year 2007-2008.

Motion: Lovelace
Second: Dellinger
Carried unanimously – Poll vote

Voting Aye: Cole, Dellinger, Kelleher, Lovelace, Polychrones,
Robinson, Mayor Seeman




SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF VIENNA, CHAPTER 18, ZONING, ARTICLE 2, SECTION 18-4, DEFINITIONS, ADDING A NEW DEFINITION FOR “PORTABLE STORAGE CONTAINER” AND TO Chapter 18, Article 17, ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, SWIMMING POOLS AND PRIVATE PARKING AREA, ADDING A NEW SECTION 18-152.3 “PORTABLE STORAGE CONTAINERS.”

Upon review of the proposed ordinance and discussion with the Town Attorney and the Director of Planning & Zoning, regarding concerns of the Planning Commission and consideration of time limitations as established in other jurisdictions, it was the consensus of Council that further review should be conducted.

It was moved that this item be deferred to allow for further review by the Town Attorney and Director of Planning & Zoning.

Motion: Cole
Second: Robinson
Carried unanimously



It was moved to adjourn.

Motion: Robinson
Second: Cole
Carried unanimously



The Regular Meeting of Council adjourned at 9:35 P.M.




PUBLIC HEARING

PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING FROM RS-16, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL ONE TO RM-2, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, FOR TWO PROPOSED THREE-STORY CONDOMINUM BUILDINGS WITH BASEMENT-LEVEL PARKING LOCATED AT 117 EAST STREET, S.E., AND 116 BERRY STREET, S.E., FILED BY LYNNE J. STROBEL OF WALSH, COLUCCI, LUBELEY, EMRICH & WALSH, P.C., AGENT FOR AYRHILL HOMES, LLC., OWNER.

September 10, 2007


The Town Council held a duly advertised Public Hearing on the above cited proposed change in zoning, on Monday, September 10, 2007, in the Council Room of the Town Hall, 127 Center Street, South. Mayor M. Jane Seeman, called the hearing to order with the following members of Council present: Laurie G. Cole, Daniel M. Dellinger, Edythe F. Kelleher, George E. Lovelace, Michael J. Polychrones, and Maud F. Robinson. Also present were John H. Schoeberlein, Town Manager; Steven D. Briglia, Town Attorney; and Carol A. Orndorff, Town Clerk.



Ms. Lynn Strobel, Attorney, agent for Ayrhill Homes, LLC, addressed Council and stated the subject property consists of two RS-16 zoned lots located at 117 East Street and 116 Berry Street; the parcel described within the rezoning plat is 100 feet in width, enclosed 44 square feet in area and stretches 440 feet from Berry Street on its southwest side to East Street on its northeast side. Ms. Strobel also stated that she would be referring to various maps and drawings during the presentations, which were the same as those distributed to Council Members in their packets. She stated the applicants proposal was a reasonable request in the framework of the surrounding uses, the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan and eligibility of the property for transitional zoning. Ms. Strobel then referred to one of the exhibits which depicted the current and transitional zoning districts that surround the subject property, and stated a rezoning of the Berry Street property to the RM-2 zone would be compatible with the existing surrounding uses. The property immediately adjacent to the applicant’s property is zoned C-1 Local Commercial and developed commercially; the adjacent property has frontage along Maple Avenue and is part of the Town’s business corridor; surrounding uses are important consideration when analyzing future development. She continued by stating the second consideration is the Comprehensive Plan; the Town’s Comprehensive Plan does not include any site specific land use recommendations for the Berry Street properties; the Plan does however, provide for a number of general recommendations with respect to the Town’s future residential development; the applicant’s proposal is in harmony with those recommendations. Further, specifically the Plan notes that townhouse and multi-family homes provide a transition between the high-density commercial industrial zones and the low density areas of single family detached homes. She further stated that although the Town’s future land use map recommends the Berry Street properties for single family detached residential use, the Plan’s future land use supporting policies note that “higher density residential zones will be needed where appropriate and necessary to provide a transition between commercial and industrial site and single family residential neighborhoods.” Ms. Strobel continued by stating that the applicant’s proposed residential development is an appropriate transition between existing commercial uses and single family housing and is in harmony with the Plan’s general vision of the Town and the desire to diversify the housing within its’ boundaries. It is important to consider the applicant’s proposal in context with other development options; the proposal this evening is for RM-2, which was not in fact, considered by the applicant when the properties were acquired several years ago; the applicant originally considered the properties redevelopment potential under the RS-16 zoning regulations as well as under the transitional zoning regulations. During the time the applicant has owned the property it has been shown to a number of single semi-detached home buyers, who have consistently voiced two overriding concerns; first, the Berry Street property is located in proximity to deteriorating high-density commercial properties along Maple Avenue, which will probably be redeveloped with increased high density uses; second, a lack of architectural control and cohesiveness is demonstrated by new development within the surrounding residential community. Ms. Strobel further stated, that as a matter of right the properties could be developed with two very large single family detached homes, already occurring within the Town; the applicant has constructed a number of homes within the Town boundaries, and this is not consistent with their product type. If the property is to be developed within the existing zoning, it will probably be sold to others for development. The second alternative considered by the applicant was the transitional zone; the properties are eligible for reclassification to the transitional zone as they are located within 200 feet of the nearest C-1 zone, as detailed within the Town Code. This zoning classification was established so that eligible properties would create valuable buffers between the Town’s business district and the low-density residential districts. Ms. Strobel continued by stating that in accordance with the Town Code, the applicant can request transitional zoning with approximately 3,400 square feet of office space and structured parking for approximately 150 vehicles; the applicant believes this to be a viable option as similar situated properties must be treated the same by the governing locality. She commented that while the Berry Street properties are eligible for transitional zoning that will result in commercial development, the applicant believes that multi-family residential development represents a more appropriate use in the specific location. Ms. Strobel for informational purposes, stated the applicant’s proposal is for RM-2 Multi-family zoning, consisting of two (2) three-story condominium buildings containing 22 dwelling units with primary access to East Street. The applicant proposes a barrier, screening and set-backs to mitigate any impacts associated with the proposal. There will be a buffer between the high-density business center to the north and the single family detached residential development to the south. The proposed buildings are separated by open space to provide natural light; parking will be provided below grade along with surface visitor parking spaces. The development includes an average of a 70 foot set-back from both Berry Street and East Street; the proposed set-backs double the required set-backs in RS-16 zones; the applicant has created the set-backs in order to maintain the majority of existing mature trees along the Berry Street properties; a tree line that runs along the 440 foot boundary between the Berry Street properties and adjacent commercial street development will be preserved, which they believe is essential considering the potential for high intensity commercial redevelopment. She continued by stating that while parking is currently located adjacent to the application property, argument has been made that the commercial parking is in fact the transitional use, it is important to remember that the commercial properties are already zoned and may be redeveloped possibly with an office building approximately 8 feet from the property line in accordance with the existing zoning. She further stated that the applicant in addition to preserving the existing trees, will plant additional screening; they are requesting fifty (50%) percent lot coverage in lieu of twenty-five percent as contained in the Town Code; trash receptacles are adjacent to the commercially zoned properties and not adjacent to the residential homes; water runoff control will be retained on-site one-hundred percent. Ms. Strobel indicated the proposal will offer individuals alternative options to those who cannot afford or choose not to purchase single family homes within the Town. Providing alternative housing options will prove to be a long term asset as individuals want to live in the Town within walking proximity of the core commercial area. Further, the applicant has analyzed traffic impact, and the development will be minimized as compared with that of a commercial by-right development. Ms. Strobel further indicated the development will prevent commercial encroachment into the residential areas as other properties do not meet the criteria of transitional zoning. In conclusion the application for redevelopment for the Berry Street properties represents the best use of these properties while minimizing impacts on the surrounding neighborhood and provides an appropriate transition between the high intensity commercial district and the single family homes.

Mayor Seeman entered into the record the Planning Commission Memorandum dated May 25, 2007, recommending denial of the application. (Memorandum attached to Official Minutes.)

Mayor Seeman called for anyone in the audience desiring to speak on the subject rezoning application.

Mr. Dennis Adams 210 East Street, S.E., spoke in opposition to the rezoning application, based on traffic impact and presented into the record a letter of opposition dated September 10, 2007. (Attached to Official Minutes.)

Councilwoman Cole and Councilman Lovelace discussed with Mr. Adams consideration of the commercial parking lot as representative of a transitional area; along with neighborhood opinion that the development is detrimental to the single family community.

Mrs. Liz Sampson, 314 East Street, S.E., spoke in opposition to the rezoning based on density and increased traffic on their already overburden streets.

Mrs. A. Antal, 509 Delano Drive, S.E., addressed several questions to Ms. Strobel relative to lot coverage, set-backs, storm water management plan and cost of the condo units. At the conclusion of this discussion, she stated she was opposed to the development.

Mr. John Loesch, 401 Berry Street, S.E., spoke in opposition to the development and urged the Town Council to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission.

Mr. Mike Trivisonno, 122 Berry Street, S.E., provided into the record a letter of opposition along with a letter from Vijay Kumar, owner of the adjacent home/lot on Berry Street, S.E., in opposition to the rezoning request. (Attached to Official Minutes.) Mr. Trivisonno spoke of the Comprehensive Plan designation of RS-16 on the property and was against any future rezoning of the property. He spoke of the rights of the builder under the Town Code requirements being, leaving the two existing homes as they are now, or to build a single family home with 25% lot coverage; that there are no other rights, unless application is made to the Town Council. Mr. Trivisonno referred to the rezoning ordinance, Section 18-248 of the Town Code regarding “Protest Against Proposed Change” and vote requirements of the Town Council contained in that section.

Mayor Seeman read into the record Section 18-248 of the Town Code as follows: “Protest Against Proposed Change; In case of a protest against any change of zone boundaries or rezoning of property signed by twenty (20) percent or more of any one of the following groups: (1) the owners of lots included within the area of the proposed change, or (2) the owners of lots abutting the area included in such proposed change, or (3) the owners of lots directly opposite the area included in such proposed change, where such area abuts upon a street, then such change shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of six-sevenths (6/7) of all the Town Council.”

Mayor Seeman inquired if anyone else in the audience desired to speak on the rezoning application. Noted for the record there were none.

Mayor Seeman discussed with Mr. Hembree, Director of Planning and Zoning, status of the parking lot behind the commercial building facing on Maple Avenue. Mr. Hembree stated the lots were part of the Murmuring Pines subdivision however, they are zoned C-1 and show that zoning designation on the Zoning Map of 1959. Upon further discussion Mr. Hembree indicated the parking lot parcels are part of the commercial building properties and must stay with the current use.

Councilman Dellinger discussed with Mr. Hembree the eligibility of the applicant to apply for transitional zoning with Mr. Hembree stating it was eligible but not an entitlement.

Councilwoman Cole discussed the number of proposed parking spaces allowed by Town Code if the rezoning was approved.

The Town Attorney for purposes of clarification, stated the application is for a rezoning only; under the Town Code if there are requests for modification such as lot coverage, the application for site plan modification would be required.

Councilwoman Kelleher questioned if any proffers had been received relative to recreational space, etc., to which Mr. Hembree replied that none were presented to date.

Councilwoman Cole discussed the traffic counts taken and clarified with Mr. Hembree the block in which the counts were conducted.

Mr. Dennis Adams, 210 East Street, S.E., stated he was present at the time the traffic marker was picked up and it had been placed in the 200 Block and there were speeds indicating 50 MPH.

Mr. Mike Nulty, 417 East Street, S.E., questioned when the traffic counts had been taken, to which the Mayor replied it was during the school year, April and May, 2007.

Resident of 411 Berry Street, S.E., spoke on previous considerations of the lots and that the Board had voted many years ago that there would be one single house to one single lot; that she did not want the neighborhood destroyed.




It was moved to close the Public Hearing.

Motion: Polychrones
Second: Robinson
Carried unanimously – Poll vote

Voting Aye: Cole, Dellinger, Kelleher, Lovelace, Polychrones,
Robinson, Mayor Seeman


Mayor Seeman stated she had been in that particular neighborhood many, many times; it is a beautiful neighborhood with lovely trees, big lots and the houses fit into the neighborhood, some large, some small. She felt that with all that had been said and all the reading which she had reviewed,
it was her belief that a rezoning would change the character of that neighborhood and therefore, she would vote against the rezoning.

Councilwoman Robinson stated that she had spent considerable time going back and forth to that neighborhood; Vienna is a fragile community in the aspect of maintaining its single family residential quality; the residential and commercial areas exist “cheek by jowl.” There are places which have been designated for townhomes but are on the extremities and not in close proximity to single family residential. It would behoove the Town Council to be very carefully and not upset the balance which currently exists. She would acquiesce that the property would offer to some who want to build on it other alternatives but to her mind it did not benefit the neighborhood or preserve the integrity of the single family residential zoning in the Town and therefore, she would vote against the application.

Councilwoman Kelleher indicated that the market exists for this type of housing however, the location in her mind is not the right place. The Comprehensive Plan on Page 60 states “multi family housing may be permitted but only in limited situations to provide an appropriate transition between very high density commercial/industrial development and single family housing.” She did not feel the proposal met the requirement of the Comprehensive Plan.

Councilman Polychrones stated Ms. Strobel enjoys an excellent reputation as a land use attorney within Fairfax County and had done an excellent service for her client. That on prior occasions, both while serving on the Planning Commission and on the Town Council, he had supported other developments of her client. He now finds that the staff report and the report of the Planning Commission very compelling, and that transitional zoning was set up for specific reasons and areas and this application just does not meet it, and he also would vote against the rezoning request.

Councilwoman Cole, the application is for classification to the RM-2 zoning and particular findings must be made to support the decisions of the Town Council. The community input is very important as it is about the neighborhood that the citizens are trying to preserve and protect. She further indicated that another section of the Comprehensive Plan on land use policies, provides objectives for protecting existing residential neighborhoods and is equally on point and states “that rezoning of assembled properties will be allowed only when such action will not adversely effect established residential neighborhoods.” She felt this section directly addresses the application and consideration must be given to what the property could become if it is rezoned to RM-2 zoning category; rather than protecting the adjoining neighborhood it would in fact destabilize the adjoining neighborhood. She felt the traffic studies indicate this is an extremely quiet neighborhood, and provides evidence that at 1:00 A.M. there are no cars going down the street; the existing traffic takes place mainly during the rush hour periods. This quiet single family residential neighborhood is what the Comprehensive Plan is designed to protect.

Councilman Lovelace indicated that in cases of rezoning he tries to determine if it is good for the Town and tries to use that measure in each consideration. One of the ways to determine this aspect is to listen to the citizens and during his recent campaign and again tonight he has not heard anyone speak in favor of the rezoning application. Also the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the single family residential zoning is the best use for the property and the property should remain with the current zoning category therefore, he would vote against the application.

Councilman Dellinger indicated the citizens had presented a very compelling argument to preserve the neighborhood; it is a beautiful area and if it was his neighborhood he would not like to see this type of development. Based on the Comprehensive Plan and the fact the residents of Murmuring Pines were against the rezoning he would also vote against the application.

It was moved for disapproval of a change in zoning from RS-16 Single Family Detached Residential zone to RM-2, Multi Family Residential zone for Fairfax County Tax Map Parcels 38-2-((09))106 and 38-2((9))107 and located at 117 East Street, S.E. and 116 Barry Street, S.E., respectively, as filed by Lynne J. Strobel of Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Walsh, P.C., agent for Ayrhill Homes, LLC, owner.

Motion: Mayor Seeman
Second: Lovelace
Carried unanimously – Poll vote

Voting Aye: Cole, Dellinger, Kelleher, Lovelace, Polychrones,
Robinson, Mayor Seeman


The Public Hearing adjourned at 9:10 P.M.

Town Government  / Town Services  / Regulations & Ordinances  / Town Information  / Town Departments  / Mailbox